There are two classes of problems: those
that are considered well defined and others that are considered ill
defined.Well-defined problems are those problems whose goals, path to solution,
and obstacles to solution are clear based on the information given. For
example, the problem of how to calculate the price of a sale item is well
defined. You see the original price on the tag, calculate the discount
percentage, and subtract this amount from the original price. The solution is a
straightforward calculation. In contrast, ill-defined problems are
characterized by their lack of a clear path to solution. Such problems often
lack a clear problem statement as well, making the task of problem definition
and problem representation quite challenging. For example, the problem of how
to find a life partner is an ill-defined problem. How do you define “life
partner”? What traits should that individual have? Where do you look to find
such a person?
Only after considerable work has been done
to formulate the problem can an ill-defined problem become tractable. Even at
this stage, however, the path to solution may remain fuzzy. Multiple revisions
of the problem representation may be necessary in order to find a path to a
solution. In contrast to well-defined problems, ill-defined problems can lead
to more than one “correct” solution.
The solution process for well-defined
problems has been studied extensively, often using algorithms to describe how
each step of a problem is solved (e.g., Newell & Simon, 1972).
A well-defined problem can
be broken down into a series of smaller
problems. The problem may then be solved using a set of recursive operations or
algorithms. In contrast, algorithms cannot be used to solve ill-defined
problems precisely because the problem cannot be easily defined as a set of
smaller components. Before a path to solution is found, ill-defined problems
often require a radical change in representation. For example, consider the
following problem:
You have a jug full of lemonade and a jug
full of iced tea. You simultaneously empty both jugs into one large vat, yet
the lemonade remains separate from the iced tea. How could this happen? At
first, this puzzle is difficult. You imagine two pitchers of refreshing drinks
being poured into a common vessel and wonder how they could not mix. (It is
safe to assume that the lemonade and iced tea have similar densities). However,
if you change your mental representation of the lemonade and iced tea, you see
that frozen drinks
could be easily poured into the same vat without mixing. Though the problem
itself does not specify the state of the drinks, most people assume that they
are liquid, as is usually the case. But this constraint is simply an
assumption. Of course, this puzzle is a fairly trivial one. But in life, we
often make unwarranted assumptions in our everyday problem solving. Such
assumptions can interfere with our ability to discover a novel solution to an
ordinary problem.
I blog often and I really appreciate your information. This great article
ReplyDeletehas truly peaked my interest. I will take a note of your blog and keep checking for new details about once a week.
I subscribed to your Feed too.
Feel free to surf to my web-site - Randall Chaiken